Planetary News: Jupiter (2005)
Amalthea Mystery: How Did a Snowball Get So Close to Jupiter?
By Emily Lakdawalla
10 June 2005
The Jupiter system is a very orderly place. The giant planet has four large
moons and a few smaller ones orbiting it in nearly circular paths. Just like
the planets in the Solar System, Jupiter's moons decrease in density systematically
as you go out. Io is close to Jupiter and made almost entirely of rock. As
you travel outward past Europa, Ganymede, and finally Callisto, the moons
have higher and higher proportions of water ice, so become less and less dense.
It is so orderly that scientists have always assumed that a little object
called Amalthea, which is Jupiter's innermost moon and the next largest after
Europa, must be a rocky body, as dense as or denser than rocky Io. But they
were wrong.
A team led by John Anderson of the Jet Propulsion laboratory has recently
completed a two-year project to analyze Galileo data on Amalthea and made
a surprising discovery. Not only is Amalthea not rocky, it is less dense even
than water; according to the team's calculations, it is about 82% (plus or
minus 9%) the density of the slightly dirty water ice typical of icy bodies
in the Solar System. "We expected something perhaps asteroidal in density,
or a solid rock object, which would have been much higher," Anderson
says. "Amalthea just doesn't fit the pattern at all."
Why is the pattern so important? Because the orderly march of decreasing
density out from Jupiter has been an important ingredient in models for how
Jupiter formed. The outer moons of Jupiter (and also Saturn) have such low
density. But these outer moons are all likely to have formed elsewhere in
the Solar System, and been captured into their eccentric orbits around the
giant planets. "You would think Amalthea was captured, because it doesn't
fit the pattern with the other satellites," Anderson said. "But
it has such a regular orbit. The orbit is almost circular and in the equatorial
plane of Jupiter, so it looks like something that formed with Jupiter."
The measurement of Amalthea's density was derived from painstaking analysis
of the radio signals sent by Galileo to the Earth as the spacecraft flew by
Amalthea on November 5, 2002. The tiny gravity of Amalthea bent Galileo's
course just slightly, changing its velocity by a mere few millimeters per
second, and that change in velocity showed up as a minute Doppler shift in
the radio signal that Galileo broadcast to Earth. Anderson and his team determined
the mass of Amalthea from this Doppler shift in Galileo's signal, and found
it to be unexpectedly small. Anderson and his team are the same people who
discovered the anomalous acceleration of the Pioneer spacecraft through Doppler
tracking.
If Amalthea is less dense than water, it pretty much has to have a composition
of water ice with lots of open pores within it, like a snowball. And Amalthea's
orbit is so close to Jupiter that the heat of the giant planet's formation
would have vaporized any water so close to it, preventing it from condensing
into a moon. That's why there's no water at Io, some at Europa, and more at
Ganymede and Callisto -- because with increasing distance from Jupiter, the
ambient temperature was lower when the system formed, so more water was available
to condense at Callisto's orbit than Io's. There is no way an icy Amalthea
could have formed where it is now.
"It has to be captured from somewhere," Anderson said. That means
that it had to form outside the orbit of at least Io and probably farther
out than that, and then somehow its orbit was perturbed to bring it in close
to Jupiter, past the Galilean satellites in its way. The problem, Anderson
says, is "there is no known mechanism for doing that. People haven’t
been working that problem because they assumed it formed with Jupiter" as
a rocky body.
Anderson's discovery means that scientists have to go back to the drawing
board to figure out how the Jupiter system formed. Either Amalthea did not
form at its current orbit, or it formed much later than all the other moons,
after the system cooled; in either case, current theories for the formation
of the Jupiter system don't stand up. It may well take another Jupiter mission
to explain this mystery!
|